King Air 350 Charter from Chicago
A King Air 350 charter is the answer to a narrow but common Midwest problem: eight people, four hundred nautical miles, an airport with a short runway, and a budget that will not stretch to a jet. The 350i carries 8 passengers — 8 in a double-club layout, 9 with the belted lavatory seat — at 312 knots, and it does it out of fields that jets either cannot use or can only use half-fuelled.
What follows is the specification sheet, the rate range we actually see quoted on Chicago-based airframes, the routes where the aircraft earns its keep, and the two types buyers usually shortlist against it. Where the trade-off goes the other way, we say so.
Who books a 350i, and what they are buying
The buyer profile is unusually consistent. It is a construction, agriculture, industrial-distribution or healthcare company with sites spread across Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan, sending five to eight people out and back in a day. They are not buying speed — a light jet would shave twenty minutes off a 300 nm leg. They are buying the ability to put eight people and their sample cases into one aircraft, land at a 4,000-foot county field twelve minutes from the plant, and be home the same evening.
The second profile is the family that wants a cabin rather than a fuselage. At 54 inches wide and 19.5 feet long, the 350's cabin is longer than most light jets and far longer than anything in the very light class. It is a squarer, more usable volume than the numbers suggest, because the flat floor runs the whole length instead of stopping at a dropped aisle.
The third — and the one operators are quietest about — is the trip that starts or ends somewhere with no jet-capable runway at all. Northern Michigan, the Iowa river towns, the Wisconsin Northwoods, the Dakotas. The turboprop is not a compromise on those trips. It is the only aircraft that goes.
King Air 350 charter specifications
The figures below are typical-configuration published numbers. Individual serial numbers vary with interior fit, aftermarket winglets and how the operator loads the aircraft, so treat them as planning figures rather than guarantees for a specific tail.
| Specification | King Air 350i |
|---|---|
| Range (typical IFR reserves, four passengers) | 1,806 nm |
| Cruise speed | 312 kts |
| Certified ceiling | 35,000 ft |
| Passengers | 8 — 8 in a double-club layout, 9 with the belted lavatory seat |
| Baggage volume | 71 cu ft |
| Cabin height | 57 in |
| Cabin width | 54 in |
| Cabin length | 19.5 ft |
| Stand-up cabin | No — seated cabin |
| Lavatory | Belted, curtained |
| Wi-Fi | Operator-dependent; many Midwest 350s carry Gogo Avance L3 |
| Manufacturer / first delivery of this variant | Textron Aviation (Beechcraft) / 2009 |
| Typical market hourly range | $2,600–$3,400 per flight hour |
The cabin, described honestly
At 57 inches of cabin height, nobody stands up in a 350. You board, you stoop for three or four steps, and you sit down. Once seated, the aircraft is genuinely comfortable: the standard double club arrangement gives four facing pairs with executive tables that fold out of the sidewall, and legroom in the club seats is better than most light jets because the fuselage is longer per seat.
The lavatory is belted, curtained — an aft seat with a curtain drawn around it. It works. It is not private in the way an enclosed door is private, and on a full eight-passenger flight most groups simply plan around it. That is the honest headline difference between this aircraft and a light jet, and for a 90-minute leg it rarely matters. For a four-hour leg with a mixed group, it matters a great deal.
Noise is the other thing nobody puts in a brochure. Two PT6A turboprops driving four-blade propellers a few feet from your shoulder produce a low, constant drone. Modern 350s have effective active noise cancellation in the sidewalls and the difference is real, but conversation is still noticeably more effortful than in a jet at altitude. Bring headphones if you intend to work.
Baggage is a genuine strength: 71 cubic feet in the aft compartment, loaded through a large door at ramp height rather than shoved into a nose locker. Golf bags, ski bags, trade-show pop-up displays and pallets of samples all go in without a conversation. Connectivity is the weakness — operator-dependent; many midwest 350s carry gogo avance l3, so confirm it on the trip sheet if the flight is a working one.
What it costs per flight hour
The typical market range for a Chicago-based 350i is $2,600–$3,400 per flight hour. That is a market range, not a quote: actual quotes vary with date, aircraft, crew duty, fuel price and availability, and a peak Friday in December will not price like a Tuesday in February.
Two things move a real quote away from that band. The first is positioning. If the aircraft lives at Chicago Executive and your trip starts at Chicago Executive, you pay for the hours you fly. If the only available 350 is sitting in Kansas City, you pay for it to come to you. The second is daily minimums — most operators bill one to two hours per day regardless of how little you fly, which quietly reprices an overnight trip with two 45-minute legs. Our private jet charter cost guide walks through how those line items stack up, and the hourly rate comparison by aircraft class shows where the turboprop sits against the jets above it.
The useful comparison is not dollars per hour but dollars per trip. A 350 at the top of its band flying a 250 nm leg in an hour and ten minutes will usually undercut a light jet doing the same leg in fifty-five minutes, because the jet's higher rate is not offset by fifteen minutes of saved time. Reverse that on a 900 nm leg and the jet wins outright.
Chicago routes where the 350 earns its keep
Every figure below is a block time — engine start to engine shutdown — not airborne time. Add roughly fifteen minutes on each end for the FBO, which is still a fraction of what a commercial itinerary costs you in the same corridor.
| Leg | Distance | Block time | Why this aircraft |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago to Nashville | 355 nm | 1h 40m | Genuinely competitive with a jet on a leg this short; BNA and John C. Tune both work |
| Chicago to Detroit | 200 nm | about 1h 05m | Against a 4h 30m drive; Oakland County and Coleman A. Young are both easy fields |
| Chicago to Minneapolis | 297 nm | about 1h 25m | Eight passengers out and back in a day without a hotel night |
| Chicago to Toronto | 380 nm | 1h 45m | Viable, though the customs paperwork pushes many buyers up to a jet |
| Chicago to Des Moines | 262 nm | about 1h 20m | Classic agribusiness day trip; small Iowa fields are no obstacle |
| Chicago to Kansas City | 355 nm | about 1h 40m | Roughly an eight-hour drive collapsed into a morning |
Against the PC-12 NGX and the CJ3+
The 350i is almost always shortlisted against one aircraft below it on price and one above it on speed. Here is the short version of each argument.
Versus the [Pilatus PC-12 NGX](/aircraft/turboprops/pilatus-pc-12/). The Pilatus is cheaper per hour and has a wider cabin. The King Air is faster, has a higher ceiling, carries substantially more baggage and has two engines — which matters less to safety statistics than most passengers assume, but matters a great deal to how some corporate flight departments and insurers write their policies. If your trip is a full eight seats with real luggage, the 350 is the more honest fit. If it is four people and a cargo door, the Pilatus wins.
Versus the [Citation CJ3+](/aircraft/light-jets/citation-cj3/). The CJ3+ is the step up to a real jet: an enclosed lavatory, a quieter cabin, a higher cruise and the ability to fly above most weather. It also costs meaningfully more per hour, and on legs under about 350 nm it does not save enough time to justify the difference. The line most Midwest buyers draw is roughly at the two-hour mark. Below it, the turboprop. Above it, the jet.
| Metric | King Air 350i | Pilatus PC-12 NGX | Citation CJ3+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passengers | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| Range | 1,806 nm | 1,803 nm | 2,040 nm |
| Cruise | 312 kts | 290 kts | 416 kts |
| Cabin width | 54 in | 60 in | 58 in |
| Baggage | 71 cu ft | 40 cu ft | 65 cu ft |
| Lavatory | Belted, curtained | Curtained | Enclosed |
| Typical hourly range | $2,600–$3,400 | $1,900–$2,700 | $3,400–$4,300 |
Before you book
- Ask which specific tail is being offered and what year the interior was refurbished — 350i cabins vary far more than the airframe does.
- Confirm whether the aircraft is flown by two pilots. Most Part 135 King Air operations are, but it is worth having in writing.
- If the destination is a short or unlit county field, ask the operator to confirm runway length, lighting and after-hours availability before you commit to a return time.
- Check whether the quoted hours include the positioning legs, and ask what the daily minimum is on a multi-day trip.
- If you need connectivity, get the Wi-Fi answer on the trip sheet rather than the phone call. Send us the trip details and we will confirm all of it against the actual airframe before you decide.
Frequently asked questions
How many passengers fit in a King Air 350 comfortably?
Eight, in the standard double-club layout, with a ninth seat available on airframes that have a belted lavatory seat. Eight is comfortable for a two-hour leg with carry-on-sized bags. If all eight passengers are travelling with full luggage for several days, check the payload with the operator — the seats are there, but weight and balance is the real limit on a longer sector.
Is a King Air 350 pressurized?
Yes. The 350 is a pressurized twin turboprop certified to 35,000 ft, so passengers sit in a normal shirt-sleeve cabin without oxygen masks. In practice Midwest operators cruise in the mid-twenties rather than at the ceiling, which means the aircraft flies closer to summer weather than a jet does and the ride can be less smooth on convective days.
Is a King Air 350 cheaper than a light jet?
Per flight hour, yes — the typical market range is $2,600–$3,400 against roughly $3,400–$4,300 for a CJ3+. Per trip, it depends on distance. Under about 350 nm the turboprop almost always costs less overall. Beyond 700 nm the jet's extra speed starts closing the gap and the comfort difference gets harder to ignore.
Can a King Air 350 land at small Midwest airports?
That is one of its main reasons to exist. The 350 operates comfortably from runways in the 3,500 to 4,500-foot range that most light jets need to be weight-restricted to use, and it handles unpaved and rough surfaces better than any jet. Always confirm the specific runway length, surface and lighting with the operator, since loaded takeoff performance on a hot day is the binding constraint.
Does a King Air 350 have a real lavatory?
It has a belted, curtained lavatory — an aft seat enclosed by a curtain rather than a door. It is usable and it is used, but it offers less privacy than the enclosed lavatory on a light jet. Groups on legs of an hour or two generally plan around it. On a three-hour-plus flight with a mixed group, it is a reasonable argument for stepping up a class.
Related pages
- Turboprop charter from ChicagoThe full class page: who flies turboprops, what they cost and where they beat jets.
- Chicago to Nashville private jetThe one long-ish route where a turboprop is genuinely competitive with a light jet.
- Chicago Executive Airport (PWK)Where most Chicago-based King Airs are hangared and where your trip will probably start.
- Private jet charter from ChicagoAirports, typical pricing and demand patterns across the Chicago market.
Further reading from the blog
Sources and further reading
- Textron Aviation King Air — Manufacturer product pages for current-production King Air variants and published performance data
- NBAA — business aviation operations resources — The National Business Aviation Association publishes operational standards and guidance used across the charter industry
Get a quote for your flight
Send us the route, the date and the number of passengers. You will get real options with all-in pricing, the operator's certificate and safety rating, and the aircraft's actual tail number — not a stock photo and a starting-from price.